Selva

Methodology & data trust

Latin American funding data is scattered: there is no single official registry, and industry reports frequently disagree with each other. Selva's answer is not to claim perfection — it is to make the collection method transparent and to validate the totals against independent industry benchmarks, continuously.

How the data is collected

Verification against industry benchmarks

We compare our per-year disclosed totals against LAVCA (approx.) annual VC investment figures, and we publish the comparison rather than describe it. Our venture-like total runs above the benchmark in most years — we count growth and late-stage rounds a VC-only tally leaves out — and below it where we have not reached a year's smaller deals. Both directions are visible in the table, per year, so the claim is checkable instead of asserted.

YearSelva, all round typesof which venture-like Industry benchmarkCoverage
2016$522M$330M$500M66%
2017$386M$386M$1.1B35%
2018$3.8B$2.4B$2.0B119%
2019$6.3B$5.5B$4.9B112%
2020$6.5B$5.7B$4.8B119%
2021$19.1B$15.8B$15.9B99%
2022$12.9B$10.5B$7.8B134%
2023$6.1B$4.4B$4.0B110%
2024$9.6B$6.3B$4.5B139%
2025$12.5B$8.3B$5.0B166%

Benchmark: LAVCA (approx.). Coverage compares the venture-like column, since that is what the benchmark measures; the first column also carries debt facilities, growth rounds, M&A and IPO raises, which the benchmark excludes by definition. We watch both: a year that jumps far outside its neighbours' range means either contamination (a mis-parsed amount) or a coverage hole, and both trigger review.

What the numbers mean (and don't)

About Selva   Data ontology